ArticleScientific reports2026
Structured dissociative PCA methods for high dimensional neuroimaging signal decomposition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sparse principal component analysis (SPCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) pipelines are widely used for fMRI blind source separation. However, applying sparsity and independence constraints in isolation can distort spatial coherence and degrade source recovery when networks overlap or exhibit strong spatial dependencies. To address these shortcomings, we propose a novel unified structured dissociative PCA framework that performs source separation by jointly learning dissociation matrices (unmixers) for singular value decomposition (SVD) and representation matrices (reconstructors) for structured basis representation within a single decomposition. Our approach integrates spatiotemporal priors (temporal DCTs, spatial splines, and hemodynamic response models) into the SVD decomposition and solves it using two algorithms: block coordinate descent (SDPCAG) and coordinate descent (SDPCAC). Both algorithms employ adaptive row-wise sparsity to disentangle overlapping sources and denoise each source through correlation-guided least-squares reconstruction with domain specific constraints. This dual-decomposition strategy, which learned iteratively, allows precise recovery of spatially coherent brain networks while maintaining temporal fidelity. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithms is illustrated on three types of fMRI datasets including synthetic, block-design, and event-related paradigms. Across all scenarios, the proposed methods consistently achieved superior performance compared to existing state-of-the-art techniques, including PMD, ACSDBE, and SICA. Overall, SDPCAG achieved a 22% improvement over ACSDBE in source recovery accuracy. Computationally, SDPCAG achieved 1.6 times faster execution compared to SDPCAC across the experimental datasets while producing comparable results. The source codes are available at https://github.com/usmankhalid06/SDPCA .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.