Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629550›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhanced generalized normal distribution optimizer with Gaussian distribution repair method and cauchy reverse learning for features selection.

Mohamed Ghetas, Mohamed Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Issa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed GhetasFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.
Mohamed Abd ElazizFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.
Mohamed IssaFaculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. Mohamed.issa@ejust.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of noisy, redundant, and irrelevant features in high-dimensional datasets significantly degrades the performance of classification models. Feature selection is a critical pre-processing step to mitigate this issue by identifying an optimal feature subset. While the Generalized Normal Distribution Optimization (GNDO) algorithm has shown promise in various domains, its efficacy for feature selection is hampered by premature convergence and an imbalance between exploration and exploitation. This paper proposes a Binary Adaptive GNDO (BAGNDO) framework to overcome these limitations. BAGNDO integrates three key strategies: an Adaptive Cauchy Reverse Learning (ACRL) mechanism to enhance population diversity, an Elite Pool Strategy to balance the search process, and a Gaussian Distribution-based Worst-solution Repair (GDWR) method to improve exploitation. The performance of BAGNDO was rigorously evaluated against nine state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms on 18 UCI benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate the superior efficacy of BAGNDO, which achieved the highest classification accuracy with the most compact feature subsets in 14 out of 18 datasets. Statistical analysis, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests, confirmed that BAGNDO's performance is significantly better, establishing it as a robust and efficient solution for wrapper-based feature selection.

Indexed as

ClassificationFeatures selectionGeneralized normal distribution optimizationMeta-heuristics

Identifiers

PMID41629550
PMCPMC12873382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.