Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629547›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2026

Radiotherapy regimens and concurrent Cabergoline use for non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a large, single-center cohort.

Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Lucas Gonçalves Rebello, Leila Maria Da Róz, Vinicius de Carvalho Gico, Eduardo Weltman, Evandro César de Souza, Rafael Loch Batista, Malebranche Berardo Carneiro da Cunha Neto, Rosangela Correa Villar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Geovanne Pedro MauroDepartment of Radiology and Oncology - Discipline of Radiotherapy- Faculdade de Medicina USP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. geovanne95@gmail.com.
Lucas Gonçalves RebelloDepartment of Radiology and Oncology - Discipline of Radiotherapy- Faculdade de Medicina USP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Leila Maria Da RózDepartment of Neurology - Discipline of Neurosurgery- Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vinicius de Carvalho GicoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Medical School of Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo WeltmanDepartment of Radiology and Oncology - Discipline of Radiotherapy- Faculdade de Medicina USP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Evandro César de SouzaDepartment of Neurology - Discipline of Neurosurgery- Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rafael Loch BatistaNeuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Malebranche Berardo Carneiro da Cunha NetoNeuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosangela Correa VillarDepartment of Radiology and Oncology - Discipline of Radiotherapy- Faculdade de Medicina USP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard treatment for non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) consists in transsphenoidal surgical resection, however when progression or recurrence happens, additional treatments like stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and dopaminergic agonists can be used. In this article we aim to describe and quantify the impact of SRT regimen and dose, as well as the use of concurrent cabergoline, on local tumor control and toxicities.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort of patients with non-functioning PitNET treated between 2008 and 2023 with LINAC-based SRT on different dose regimens with or without cabergoline, in a single university hospital.

resultsOne-hundred twenty-six (126) patients were assessed. Median follow-up was 62.6 months (7.1 – 135.8 months). Most patients already had a visual deficit (65.1%) or hormonal dysfunction (52.4%) before SRT. Lesion size (median larger diameter is 2.5cm) and younger age were correlated with the use of fractionated SRT (FRT) (respectively, p>0.001 and p=0.006). 5 year control rate was 96.8%. For single-dose radiosurgery (SRS), they were 90.5% and 57.2 months, respectively. For FRT, 66.7% and 44.9 months, respectively. Cabergoline use did not influence results. There were no differences in new hormonal deficits among groups. Symptomatic radionecrosis was reported in only one patient. Strokes and CNS bleeding were reported in three patients. There were no secondary malignancies reported.

conclusionNo difference was found between SRS and FRT, the usage of cabergoline did not affect response. SRT brings good control with low toxicity in non-functional PitNET. However further prospective research is needed.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCabergolineDopamine AgonistsNeuroendocrine TumorsPituitary NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsCabergolineDopamine AgonistsPituitary adenomasRadiosurgeryRadiotherapyStereotactic

Identifiers

PMID41629547
PMCPMC12864329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.