SynthesisLasers in medical science2026
Effectiveness of laser photobiomodulation in the management of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered IL1R1-CD3 Tregs modulate neuroimmune responses and attenuate neuropathic pain in a rat CCI model.Immunologic research · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation in the management of oral lesions: a targeted, evidence-based approach.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic literature review aimed to assess the effectiveness of laser photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) in reducing pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia. Randomized controlled clinical trials were identified through searches in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. No studies involving patients with postherpetic neuralgia met the inclusion criteria and were therefore excluded. Nine studies, comprising a total of 387 patients diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia, were included. In seven of these studies, patients also received pharmacological treatment, which was initiated either prior to or concurrently with the PBM intervention. A sham laser was used as a control in six studies. PBM parameters varied widely and were often incompletely reported, limiting the ability to compare treatment protocols. Qualitative analysis showed that eight out of nine studies reported a significantly greater reduction in pain scores in the PBM groups compared to control groups. A low to moderate risk of bias was found in two-thirds of the studies. The meta-analysis, which included five studies, demonstrated a significant effect of PBM in reducing pain scores (MD − 2.17; 95% CI, − 3.30 to − 1.04; P = 0.0002), although high heterogeneity was observed (I² = 92%). PBM appears to be an effective adjuvant therapy for trigeminal neuralgia, with a favorable safety profile and potential to reduce medication dependency. Nevertheless, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to substantial heterogeneity, lack of PBM protocol standardization, and limited long-term outcome data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.