ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026
A multiplex assay based on capillary electrophoresis to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: development and clinical validation.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a novel multiplex assay based on capillary electrophoresis (CE) for the simultaneous detection of three Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) genes: IS6110, rpoB, and HSP65. Unlike conventional molecular diagnostic methods that target only a single gene, which may lead to misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis, this CE-based multiplex approach provides comprehensive detection to reduce diagnostic errors. Specificity testing with 76 microorganisms representing common respiratory pathogens confirmed 100% analytical specificity with no cross-reactivity, while sensitivity analysis demonstrated detection limits ranging from 10 to 20 copies/mL for all three target genes. In a prospective clinical validation study of 1067 patients suspected of pulmonary tuberculosis, the multiplex assay showed 77.4% sensitivity (CI 74.9%-79.9%), 99.6% specificity (CI 99.2%-100%), 96.0% positive predictive value (CI 94.8%-97.2%), and 97.1% negative predictive value (CI 96.1%-98.1%). Notably, the study identified 6 MTBC strains (4.8% of TB patients) with IS6110 deletions through whole-genome sequencing, which would result in false-negative results for any commercial PCR kits targeting IS6110. This integrated multiplex approach enhances diagnostic accuracy by simultaneously targeting multiple genes; then it offers the potential to reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of tuberculosis. In summary, the multiplex assay provides a more comprehensive alternative to current single-target molecular methods for MTBC detection. KEY POINTS: • The multiplex assay provides one-run results for IS6110, rpoB, and HSP65. • The multiplex assay is a more comprehensive method to detect MTBC. • This approach can reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.