Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629482›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Performance of wall mesh encased stone columns using recycled rubber concrete and asphalt aggregates for sustainable geotechnics.

Mohammad Hassanzadeh, Amirali Zad, Mohammad Hassan Ramesht, Mojtaba Aslmand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad HassanzadehDepartment of Civil Engineering, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Amirali ZadDepartment of Civil Engineering, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. a.zad@iauctb.ac.ir.
Mohammad Hassan RameshtDepartment of Civil Engineering, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba AslmandDepartment of Civil Engineering, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing volume of construction and demolition waste, together with discarded tires, highlights the urgent need for sustainable alternatives in soil improvement. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) are widely used to enhance bearing capacity and reduce settlement in soft soils, yet their reliance on natural aggregates contributes to resource depletion. To address this gap, this study evaluates the performance of GESCs constructed with recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), and shredded waste rubber as partial replacements for natural gravel. A comprehensive experimental program consisting of 34 large-scale model tests was conducted with constant L/D ratio, two column diameters, and multiple material combinations. The findings show that several recycled mixtures, particularly those incorporating RCA and small rubber fractions, exhibited improved stiffness, enhanced stress–displacement response, and more controlled deformation compared with conventional gravel columns. Quantitatively, recycled-aggregate GESCs achieved up to 2% higher bearing capacity and Stress-to-Displacement Ratio of 12.6 compare to natural gravel columns, demonstrating their viability as an effective and environmentally sustainable ground-improvement solution.

Indexed as

Bearing capacityGeosynthetic encasementRecycled rubberSoil improvementStone columnSustainable geotechnics

Identifiers

PMID41629482
PMCPMC12916974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.