ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance of wall mesh encased stone columns using recycled rubber concrete and asphalt aggregates for sustainable geotechnics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing volume of construction and demolition waste, together with discarded tires, highlights the urgent need for sustainable alternatives in soil improvement. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) are widely used to enhance bearing capacity and reduce settlement in soft soils, yet their reliance on natural aggregates contributes to resource depletion. To address this gap, this study evaluates the performance of GESCs constructed with recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), and shredded waste rubber as partial replacements for natural gravel. A comprehensive experimental program consisting of 34 large-scale model tests was conducted with constant L/D ratio, two column diameters, and multiple material combinations. The findings show that several recycled mixtures, particularly those incorporating RCA and small rubber fractions, exhibited improved stiffness, enhanced stress–displacement response, and more controlled deformation compared with conventional gravel columns. Quantitatively, recycled-aggregate GESCs achieved up to 2% higher bearing capacity and Stress-to-Displacement Ratio of 12.6 compare to natural gravel columns, demonstrating their viability as an effective and environmentally sustainable ground-improvement solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.