ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026
Vasectomy reversal: lessons learned to optimize clinical outcomes.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vasectomy reversal (VR) has remained the longstanding gold standard for men seeking paternity following a history of vasectomy. Ever since its initial description, numerous innovations have occurred in the field of reproductive urology to optimize perioperative outcomes. Additional considerations such as preoperative patient and patient's partner evaluation, medical optimization, and perioperative surveillance protocols are now a paramount component of caring for patients with obstructive azoospermia undergoing vasectomy reversal. Finally, numerous surgical innovations have been described which may lead to increased duration of patency in the postoperative setting. This review aims to provide a comprehensive update on the management of obstructive azoospermia secondary to vasectomy and all salient considerations including preoperative evaluation, intraoperative decision making, surgical technique, and postoperative surveillance.
Identifiers
41629441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.