ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated quantification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes by machine learning reveals prognostic and immunogenomic features in lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Two-Year Incident Distant Metastasis in Stage I-III Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are key components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and are recognized as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, manual TIL assessment on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides is subjective and poorly reproducible. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated, machine learning–based framework for TIL quantification and explore its associations with immunogenomic features and patient outcomes. H&E-stained slides and transcriptomic, genomic, and clinical data from lung adenocarcinoma patients were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). An automated TIL quantification pipeline was built in QuPath (v0.5.1) with stain normalization, watershed cell segmentation, and a supervised cell classifier to identify tumour cells, stromal cells, and TILs. In a separate step, a random forest model based on aggregated Haralick texture features and tumour stage was trained to classify patients into high- and low-TIL subgroups. TIL density cut-offs were defined by maximally selected rank statistics. Survival was analyzed via the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression. ssGSEA, ESTIMATE, GSVA, and WGCNA were applied to characterize immune infiltration and transcriptomic modules. Somatic mutations were compared between groups, and drug sensitivity was predicted via GDSC-derived ridge regression models. Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation with SMOTE oversampling. Automated quantification achieved high concordance with the results of the pathologist review and RNA-seq inference. An optimal TIL cut-off of 135 cells/mm2 was used to stratify patients into high- and low-density groups. High-TIL tumors were enriched for adaptive immune infiltration, antigen presentation, and TCR signaling, and exhibited greater mutational diversity, whereas low-TIL tumors were enriched in ribosome biogenesis and protein translation pathways. Prognostically, high-TIL density was associated with improved overall survival (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.29–0.79; P = 0.004). The predicted IC50 values did not differ for standard chemotherapies but varied for the selected compounds. The Haralick-based classification model achieved an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.835–0.901) in internal cross-validation, which improved to 0.892 (95% CI 0.848–0.913) when tumour stage was incorporated. This study demonstrated that automated TIL quantification is feasible and prognostically relevant in lung cancer and may provide a hypothesis-generating marker of immune activation for future immunotherapy studies; however, direct validation in immunotherapy-treated cohorts is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.