ArticleScientific reports2026
A computationally efficient approach to quantum state reconstruction using robust classical shadows.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantum state tomography is a fundamental technique for characterizing quantum systems, but its scalability remains a significant challenge. This paper investigates an efficient alternative using classical shadows to reconstruct a Bell state with high fidelity. Classical shadows provide a compressed representation of a quantum state using randomized measurements, reducing the measurement complexity compared to full quantum tomography when full state reconstruction is not required. We employed a quantum circuit to generate a Bell state and utilize 1000 snapshots to construct its classical shadow. The reconstructed density matrix is evaluated using fidelity and norm difference metrics against the ideal Bell state. Our analysis demonstrates that as the number of snapshots increases, the fidelity of reconstruction stabilizes around 0.98-1.0, with the norm difference decreasing accordingly. The results also confirm the convergence of reconstructed states towards the ideal Bell state, highlighting the efficiency and accuracy of classical shadows in quantum state estimation. Shallow shadow tomography uses shallow random circuits to estimate global quantum state properties on noisy hardware. By combining low-depth entangling gates with randomized measurements and noise-aware postprocessing, it reduces sample complexity compared to Pauli shadows while remaining experimentally feasible. Recent experiments on superconducting processors confirmed up to fivefold measurement savings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.