ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on structural damage identification based on temporal power flow graph network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural damage identification is a critical technique for ensuring the safety and reliability of large-scale civil structures. However, existing purely data-driven approaches based on deep learning still suffer from limited physical interpretability and generalization capability. To address this limitation, a physics-informed graph neural network framework, namely the Temporal Power Flow Graph Network (TPF-GNet), is proposed. The principal innovation of TPF-GNet is the Temporal Power Flow Propagation (TPFP) module, which explicitly characterizes energy transmission in structural dynamics and embeds dynamic power flow into the message-passing process of graph neural networks. TPF-GNet utilizes multi-sensor acceleration responses around a target node as input, reconstructs the target sensor's acceleration time history by simulating the energy flow process, and enables unsupervised damage detection and localization through reconstruction errors. Numerical simulations and scaled benchmark frame tests demonstrate that TPF-GNet surpasses conventional GNN and LSTM baseline models in both accuracy and physical interpretability. The results demonstrate that incorporating dynamic power flow markedly improves the model's ability to capture structural state changes induced by stiffness degradation or local damage. This study establishes a physics-constrained paradigm for structural health monitoring, particularly well-suited to engineering applications without damage labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.