ArticleScientific reports2026
Parameter extraction of photovoltaic cell/module models using starfish optimization algorithm with a secant-based objective function modification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Osprey Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization with Application to PEM Fuel Cell Parameter Identification.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A novel reflective intelligence optimizer with machine learning (RIO-ML) for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of photovoltaic (PV) cell and module parameters is essential for reliable electrical modeling, performance assessment, and long-term energy yield prediction. This task is commonly formulated as an optimization problem, where the root mean square error (RMSE) between measured and estimated current-voltage characteristics is minimized. While numerous metaheuristic algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem, most existing studies focus primarily on algorithmic modifications, with limited attention given to enhancing the problem formulation itself. In this work, a recently introduced metaheuristic, the Starfish Optimization Algorithm (SFOA), is employed for PV parameter extraction and systematically evaluated against four contemporary optimization algorithms. In addition, a novel secant-based reformulation of the objective function is proposed to improve the accuracy of the parameter estimation process beyond the conventional RMSE-based approach. The proposed framework is validated on multiple PV models, including the single-diode (SDM), double-diode (DDM), and three-diode (TDM) models for PV cells, as well as the single-diode model of a PV module (PVM). Two widely used benchmark datasets, RTC France and Photowatt-PWP201, are used for experimental verification. The results demonstrate that integrating the secant-based objective function significantly enhances estimation accuracy and robustness across all considered models. In particular, the SFOA-Secant configuration achieves the lowest RMSE values of [Formula: see text] for SDM, [Formula: see text] for DDM, [Formula: see text] for TDM, and [Formula: see text] for PVM, outperforming all competing methods. These findings confirm that reformulating the objective function using the secant method constitutes an effective and complementary strategy for improving PV parameter extraction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.