ArticleNature communications2026
An interpretable AI system reduces false-positive MRI diagnoses by stratifying high-risk breast lesions.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FUO-PETMamba: a pet maximum-intensity-projection-based artificial intelligence framework for aetiological classification of fever of unknown origin with multicentre validation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- An interpretable AI system reduces false-positive MRI diagnoses by stratifying high-risk breast lesions.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging remains limited by high false-positive rates and substantial inter-reader variability, especially for lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, often leading to unnecessary biopsies. Here we show that the BI-RADS 4 Lesions Analysis System (BL4AS), an artificial intelligence system powered by foundation models and leveraging the rich spatiotemporal information of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, addresses these diagnostic challenges. Developed on a multicenter dataset of 2,803 lesions from 2,686 female patients, BL4AS demonstrates robust performance with areas under the curve of 0.892-0.930 and significantly outperforms radiologists in specificity (0.889 versus 0.491). BL4AS-assisted interpretation significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for both senior and junior radiologists, reducing inter-reader variability by 24.5% and decreasing false-positive rates by 27.3%. BL4AS further stratifies lesions into subcategories (4 A, 4B and 4 C) for refined risk assessment, offering a practical tool for precision breast cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.