ArticleBDJ open2026
Therapeutic pulpotomy for permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: comparative results from a practice-based quick poll in the USA and UK.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Conservative Restorative Protocol for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: Clinical Success and Rapid Pain Relief in a 27-Case Series with 36-Month Follow-Up.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Determinants of Definitive Full Pulpotomy Adoption in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Multivariable Analysis of Dental Trainee Decision-Making.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsTreatment paradigms for teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth are evolving, with increasing interest in conservative approaches such as therapeutic pulpotomy. Understanding the perspectives of both general dentists and endodontists is essential to defining current clinical practices and informing future research. This study explored dental practitioners' approaches to the diagnosis and management of irreversible pulpitis, with a focus on the use of pulpotomy as a definitive treatment.
methodsAn online "Quick Poll" cross-sectional survey was distributed to dental practitioners in the United States via the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network and in the United Kingdom through open online channels, including local dental networks, practice-based research networks, and social media platforms.
resultsA total of 750 practitioners responded (USA: 416; UK: 334), most of whom were general dental practitioners with over 10 years of experience. Irreversible pulpitis was most diagnosed in 1-5 patients per month. Root canal therapy was the predominant treatment in both countries (USA: 77%; UK: 90%), with extraction frequently selected in the UK (50%). Pulpotomy was reported as a treatment strategy by 20% of USA and 16% of UK respondents, though a larger proportion expressed willingness to consider it as a definitive option (USA: 47%; UK: 87%).
conclusionThis preliminary study highlights the growing interest in therapeutic pulpotomy as a definitive treatment for teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth in primary care. Differences in clinical adoption and attitudes between the USA and UK suggest opportunities for further research, education, and implementation support to facilitate the integration of vital pulp therapies into routine practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.