Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629171›Full record

Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026

Transcranial direct current stimulation is safe and feasible in hyperacute ischemic stroke (DICAST-SF trial).

Matej Slovak, David Kemlink, Pavel Dusek, Petra Rekova, Vratislav Fabian, Martin Jurka, Davide Carone, Alistair Perry, George W J Harston, Evzen Ruzicka and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04801446 (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment - Safety and Feasibility Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04801446 nacompletednot on this map

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment - Safety and Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral University Hospital, PragueRan2021 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsStrokeArmsSoterix Medical 1X1 tDCS stimulator (active C-tDCS), Soterix Medical 1X1 tDCS stimulator (sham stimulation)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Matej SlovakDepartment of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: matej.slovak@vfn.cz.
David KemlinkDepartment of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel DusekDepartment of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petra RekovaDepartment of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vratislav FabianDepartment of Physics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin JurkaDepartment of Radiology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Davide CaroneBrainomix Limited, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alistair PerryBrainomix Limited, Oxford, United Kingdom.
George W J HarstonOxford University Hospitals NHSFT, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Evzen RuzickaDepartment of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dagmar AltmanovaDepartment of Radiology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lukas LambertDepartment of Radiology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Imaging Methods, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andrea BurgetovaDepartment of Radiology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Helena KnotkovaMJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, New York, NY, United States.
Abhishek DattaSoterix Medical Inc., New York, NY, United States.
Marom BiksonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Michael A NitscheLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany; Bielefeld University, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bielefeld, Germany.
Mersedeh Bahr-HosseiniDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) is a potential neuroprotective method in the hyperacute phase of ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess safety, tolerability, feasibility, and potential efficacy of C-tDCS in stroke patients with salvageable penumbra. DICAST-SF was a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled (3 active: 1 sham), 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial. Inclusion criteria were stroke due to occlusion of the internal carotid or middle cerebral artery, last known well time within 24 h, substantial penumbra on CT perfusion, and ineligibility for mechanical thrombectomy. We applied C-tDCS at six dose tiers over the affected primary motor cortex. The primary safety outcome was the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) rate at 24 h post-stimulation. Secondary outcomes included the rates of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (AICH), early neurological deterioration, serious adverse events, and 90-day mortality. Tolerability was assessed by completion rate and questionnaires. Feasibility threshold was defined as median randomization-to-C-tDCS start time within 10 min in the last ten patients. Twenty five patients were enrolled (19 active, 6 sham), mean age 81 (SD 12) years, 16 women, median NIHSS 8 (IQR 6-16). Ten active and 4 sham patients were treated with thrombolysis. No SICH occurred. Three AICH (2 post-thrombolysis) occurred in the active arm. Rates of early deterioration, serious adverse events, and mortality (4 active vs. 2 sham) were comparable. C-tDCS was well tolerated and feasible, median randomization-to-C-tDCS start time was 8 (7-9) min. C-tDCS in hyperacute stroke was safe, well tolerated, and feasible. Findings support further evaluation in larger efficacy trials.

trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04801446.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAcute strokeNeuroprotectionPenumbra freezingTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41629171
PMCPMC12976498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.