Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629164›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

When Familiar Faces Feel Better: A Framework for Social Neurocognitive Aging in a Rat Model.

Subhadeep Dutta Gupta, Jeffrey M Long, Peter R Rapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subhadeep Dutta GuptaLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.ORCID 0000-0002-0024-3315
Jeffrey M LongLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.
Peter R RappLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland 21224 rappp@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-0983-3944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cognition, central to emotional and cognitive well-being, is particularly vulnerable to aging, where impairments can lead to isolation and functional decline. Despite compelling evidence that altered social behavior is associated with cognitive decline and dementia risk, experimental strategies for testing causative links remain scarce. To address this gap, we aimed to establish a rat model for research on social neurocognitive aging. We conducted a large-scale behavioral study in 169 male young (6 months) and aged (24-25 months) Long-Evans rats. In order to explore potential relationships among aging outcomes, we first documented individual differences in a widely validated water maze test of hippocampal learning and memory. Sociability and social novelty were then evaluated in the same subjects using the three-chamber social interaction test. Aging induced a selective shift in social novelty preference, marked by a striking familiarity bias in a substantial subpopulation of old rats, while sociability remained entirely normal. Changes in social novelty preference were completely independent of individual differences in spatial memory and unrelated to anxiety or sensorimotor function. Notably, neuromodulation via TMS enhanced social novelty preference selectively in aged rats that exhibited a social introversion phenotype before treatment, consistent with the possibility that this aging condition reflects a distinct and modifiable neural network state. Together, the results establish a valuable preclinical framework for developing a comprehensive neurobiology of social cognition in aging.

Indexed as

AgingCognitive AgingFacial RecognitionRecognition, PsychologySocial BehaviorSocial CognitionAnimalsMaleMaze LearningModels, AnimalRatsRats, Long-EvansSocial Interactioncognitive agingintermittent theta burst stimulationmemorysocial cognitiontranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41629164
PMCPMC12893812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.