ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Dynamic Representation of Multidimensional Object Properties in the Human Brain.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling objects' contextual associations from perceptual and conceptual attributes using time-resolved neural decoding.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Parallel processing of distinct facial signals for the rapid evaluation of social agents.iScience · 2026Article
- Achieving more human brain-like vision via human EEG representational alignment.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Mapping object space dimensions: New insights from temporal dynamics.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our visual world consists of an immense number of unique objects and yet, we are easily able to identify, distinguish, and reason about the things we see within a few hundred milliseconds. Here, we used a large-scale and comprehensively sampled stimulus set and developed an analysis approach to capture how rich, multidimensional object representations unfold over time in the human brain. We modeled time-resolved MEG signals of four humans (two females and two males) viewing single presentations of tens of thousands of object images based on millions of behavioral judgments. Extracting behavior-derived object dimensions from similarity judgments, we developed a data-driven approach to guide our understanding of the neural representation of the object space and found that every dimension is reflected in the neural signal. Studying the temporal profiles for different object dimensions, we found that the time courses fell into two broad types, with either a distinct and early peak (∼125 ms) or a slow rise to a late peak (∼300 ms). Further, early effects were stable across participants, in contrast to later effects which showed more variability, suggesting that early peaks may carry stimulus-specific and later peaks more participant-specific information. Dimensions with early peaks appeared to be primarily visual dimensions and those with later peaks more conceptual, suggesting that conceptual representations are more variable across people. Together, these data provide a comprehensive account of how behavior-derived object properties unfold in the human brain and form the basis for the rich nature of object vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.