ArticleOpen heart2026
Bridging machine learning and clinical practice: a multicentre nomogram for 90-day graft failure risk stratification in heart transplantation.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in heart and lung transplantation.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly graft failure within 90 postoperative days is the leading cause of mortality after heart transplantation. Existing risk scores, based on linear regression, often struggle to capture the complex, multifactorial biological interactions necessary for personalised donor-recipient matching. This study utilised explainable machine learning (ML) to identify robust predictors of 90-day graft failure and developed a clinically interpretable, ML-informed nomogram designed specifically for cross-population generalisability.
methodsUsing the UNOS registry (2008-2020; n=25 200), XGBoost/Random Forest models identified 90-day graft failure predictors from 32 donor-recipient variables. Explainable AI (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis revealed key predictors and their non-linear interactions, which were translated into a clinically applicable nomogram. External validation was performed on a large, single-centre Chinese cohort (Wuhan Union Hospital ; 2018-2023; n=563), assessing performance via area under the curve (AUC), calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA).
findingsThe final model incorporated eight predictors: recipient factors (prior cardiac surgery, age, bilirubin, body mass index (BMI)), donor factors (age, gender, BMI) and cold ischaemia time. The XGBoost-derived nomogram demonstrated consistent discrimination (AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.70) and calibration. Patients stratified into the high-risk group (top quantile by nomogram score) had a 2.4-fold increased hazard of graft failure (HR 2.42, 95% CI 2.11 to 2.78). DCA confirmed the model's clinical utility across a wide range of risk thresholds (0.0-0.4). External validation in the Chinese cohort affirmed its generalisability (AUC 0.67).
conclusionThis study introduces an ML-informed nomogram for 90-day graft failure, validated across USA and Chinese populations. By translating ML insights into a clinically interpretable tool using routinely available pretransplant variables, it bridges a key translational gap in transplant risk prediction. This tool can aid in optimising donor-recipient matching and personalising post-transplant management, with the potential to help address geographic disparities in heart transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.