Observational studyBMJ health & care informatics2026
Electronic health record use in physiotherapy: adoption, perceived relevance and utilisation patterns-a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to assess electronic health record (EHR) use in physiotherapy, identify factors influencing its adoption and evaluate physiotherapists' perceptions of its relevance.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 138 licensed physiotherapists recruited through digital platforms. EHR utilisation was evaluated using the RSEFisio scale, a validated instrument designed to capture multiple dimensions of EHR use in physiotherapy. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were applied to examine usage patterns and contextual factors. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.
resultsThe EHR utilisation rate was 78.3%. Higher utilisation was significantly associated with adequate time allocated for documentation (p DISCUSSION: Despite the high level of EHR utilisation, physiotherapy documentation remains incomplete and driven by perceived clinical relevance. Utilisation improves with adequate time, standardised recording and interprofessional access. Inconsistent data quality undermines continuity of care and limits secondary uses, including artificial intelligence integration. Strengthening documentation is essential to improve clinical workflows and support data-driven decision-making in physiotherapy.
conclusionPhysiotherapists recognise the value of comprehensive documentation, but report limited time and incomplete records. The disconnect between awareness and practice highlights the need for practical, system-level strategies to support more consistent and effective EHR use in physiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.