Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628936›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Protocol for a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to identify the most important research priorities addressing respiratory health disparities affecting the Black community in the UK.

Kasope Wolffs, Melanie Etti, Ruby Zelzer, Priyanka Punja, Suzannah Kinsella, Erika Kennington, Adewale Adebajo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kasope WolffsSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK wolffsk@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9838-5396
Melanie EttiDepartment for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ruby ZelzerReimagine Redefine, Nottingham, UK.
Priyanka PunjaAsthma and Lung UK, London, UK.
Suzannah KinsellaJames Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Erika KenningtonAsthma and Lung UK, London, UK.
Adewale AdebajoSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-7083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRespiratory diseases affect millions of people in the UK, with a disproportionately high burden seen among many marginalised communities. They are the third leading cause of death in the UK and a major driver of morbidity, disability and healthcare service use. Many respiratory conditions cause debilitating symptoms and deterioration in patients' health and quality of life over time, resulting in substantial increases in National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Social inequalities, including occupational, housing and environmental disparities, have led to a disproportionate burden of respiratory disease among the Black community. For many Black people living in the UK, respiratory conditions have been under-recognised, misdiagnosed or inadequately treated, further contributing to disparities in health outcomes. Despite the need to address these urgent challenges, research in this area is fragmented and rarely informed by the views and opinions of those most affected. Research prioritisation provides a structured methodology to address this unmet need. The Equal Breath Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) aims to identify the 10 most urgent research priorities in respiratory health for people of Black heritage through meaningful collaboration with people with lived experience of respiratory disease, their caregivers and family members and the healthcare professionals caring for them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The top 10 research priorities for the Equal Breath PSP will be established using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method. A steering group comprising approximately 12 people from key stakeholder groups will first be assembled to guide the PSP. Once the context and scope of the PSP has been agreed, the first survey will be developed and disseminated among stakeholder communities to identify evidence uncertainties. Data analysis of the survey responses will create summary questions and critical appraisal of available evidence will verify which of these are evidence gaps. A longlist of approximately 50 summary questions derived from the first survey will be shared with stakeholders in a second shortlisting survey. The highest ranking questions from this survey will be taken into a workshop where the top 10 research priorities will be established through a consensus process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This PSP employs the JLA methodology, which does not constitute research as defined by the Health Research Authority. Survey respondent data will be stored in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulation by Asthma+Lung UK. The final 10 research priorities will be shared with funders, policymakers, professional bodies and relevant communities to inform future investment and promote equity in respiratory health.

Indexed as

Black PeopleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PrioritiesHealth Status DisparitiesResearchRespiratory Tract DiseasesHumansResearch DesignSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited KingdomAsthmaCommunity ParticipationHealth EquityHealth policyPulmonary DiseasePulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID41628936
PMCPMC12878385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.