ReviewBMJ open2026
Embedding ethics into Genomics England's Generation Study.
Review in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Generation Study is a large-scale research initiative led by Genomics England in partnership with the National Health Service, aiming to evaluate the use of whole genome sequencing in newborn screening, as well as ongoing research use of these genomic data. The Generation Study will sequence 100 000 newborn genomes in England to potentially identify approximately 200 rare and treatable conditions. This paper outlines the study's approach to embedding ethics from inception through implementation. A model of 'ethical embeddedness' that emphasises transparency, trustworthiness and responsiveness to uncertainty is utilised. Drawing on the deliberations of a multidisciplinary Ethics Working Group, public dialogue findings and design research, the paper presents key decisions and our approach to complex ethical challenges including consent, potential impact of the study on clinical services and navigating uncertainty. The paper also reflects on the ethical tensions inherent in balancing research ambitions with operational realities, particularly in a context of evolving genomic science and sometimes limited regulatory clarity. By embedding ethics into the study's design and delivery, we hope to foster public trust and inform future policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.