ArticleBMJ open2026
Identifying emotional variations in Spanish oncology patients during treatment decision consultations: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis qualitative study aims to identify which themes cause the most emotional variation in patients' decisions about cancer treatment. Patients' emotional variations are analysed to detect negative and positive variations to certain themes during the consultations. This analysis helps to detect what themes or elements affect patients' experiences. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A total of 31 clinical consultations from cancer care pathways were recorded, transcribed and analysed. Patients were followed up until they decided and started treatment for their cancer. An inductive content analysis is followed to interpret patients' emotional variations. All patients were from Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet of Zaragoza, Spain.
participantsTwelve patients participated in the study, consisting of eight with breast cancer and four with melanoma. Of these patients, nine were female and three were male. Eligible participants were required to be new to the care pathways or to have used them more than 10 years ago. Participants were also required to be aged 18 or older, be fluent in Spanish and be available to participate for 3 months. Participants were excluded if the authors or oncologists noticed poor health conditions that could be exacerbated by the stress and additional effort involved in participating in the study.
resultsPatients' emotional variations identify five main themes: clinical history, cancer diagnosis, discussion of possible treatment choice, side effects (possible side effects of the selected treatment) and next steps (require complementary medical tests and more consultations to decide the treatment). Most of the emotional variations detected were negative and were mostly grouped into the categories of treatment, side effects and next steps. The most pronounced negative variations were related to delays in starting treatment and the possibility of hair loss.
conclusionsThe themes and emotional variations identified in this study can help to understand patients' experiences during their initial oncology consultations. These results represent a significant step towards enhancing communication and the patient experience within oncology practices. Oncologists could use these data and procedures to identify where patients experience negative emotions and respond appropriately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.