Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628920›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with ischaemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes in Swedish primary care: a cross-sectional analysis of regional primary care registry data (QregPV).

Tobias Andersson, Johan-Emil Bager, Margareta Hellgren, Maria Åberg, Georgios Mourtzinis

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias AnderssonGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden tobias.andersson@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-8460
Johan-Emil BagerDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-7216
Margareta HellgrenGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maria ÅbergGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Georgios MourtzinisDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-8746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) among patients with coexisting ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care, in relation to European guidelines.

designCross-sectional observational study.

setting209 primary healthcare centres in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden (population 1.8 million in 2023).

participants14 414 patients with registered prevalent diagnoses of coexisting IHD and T2D, September 2023, in QregPV, the regional primary care quality of care register in Region Västra Götaland. Data on dispensed drugs were retrieved from the regional prescribed drug register, Digitalis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with dispensed SGLT2i or GLP-1 RA in relation to sex, age and primary healthcare centres (including private vs public ownership). The secondary outcome was estimated additional prescription costs.

resultsSGLT2i was dispensed to 37.2%, less often to women (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.64 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.70)). GLP-1 RA was dispensed to 10.0%, with no sex difference (aOR 1.04 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.18)). Use of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA declined with age (p<0.001). Use across primary healthcare centres (95% central range) varied from 17.1% to 56.4% for SGLT2i and 0.0% to 23.4% for GLP-1 RA, without differences between private versus public primary healthcare centres (SGLT2i: aOR 0.95 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.06); GLP-1 RA: aOR 1.06 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.26)). Variation across primary healthcare centres was substantial (SGLT2i: adjusted median OR (aMOR) 1.29 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.36); GLP-1 RA: aMOR 1.48 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.62)). Treating all patients would increase the annual prescription costs, €3.9 million for SGLT2i and €10.4 million for GLP-1 RA.

conclusionSGLT2i and GLP-1 RA were underutilised in patients with coexisting IHD and T2D. The sex disparity in SGLT2i use warrants attention, as does the substantial variation between primary healthcare centres and the challenges of implementing costly cardioprotective therapies.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsMyocardial IschemiaSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRegistriesSwedenGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsCoronary heart diseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug TherapyGuideline AdherencePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID41628920
PMCPMC12878446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.