ArticleGenetics2026
Predicting the topography of fitness landscapes from the structure of genotype-phenotype maps.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph-based representations in modern protein science.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- A simple model captures key characteristics of biological non-deterministic genotype-phenotype maps.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Bounding phenotype transition probabilities via conditional complexity.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ruggedness-the prevalence of fitness peaks-and navigability-the existence of fitness-increasing paths to a target-are key factors affecting evolution on fitness landscapes. Here, we analyze these properties in landscapes that inherit biophysically grounded genotype-phenotype (GP) maps. By assuming a random phenotype-fitness assignment as a baseline, the structure of the GP maps is included without imposing further fitness correlations. We show analytically that the expected ruggedness can be predicted from two quantities: the sizes of neutral components (NCs)-mutationally connected genotype sets with the same phenotype-and their evolvabilities, defined as the number of distinct phenotypes among the NC's mutational neighbors. Other features-such as robustness-influence ruggedness only indirectly via correlations with evolvability. Numerical results across diverse GP maps confirm that NC size and evolvability alone suffice to predict both the mean prevalence and heights of peaks. These calculations also provide new insights: Under random phenotype-fitness assignment, peaks arising from high-evolvability NCs have higher expected fitness than those from low-evolvability NCs. Thus, when evolvability correlates positively with NC size, the formation of large low-fitness peaks is impeded. We further derive an approximate scaling law for the minimal average evolvability required for navigability. Our framework applies broadly across GP maps, providing general insight into when and why fitness landscapes are expected to be rugged or navigable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.