Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628636›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2026

[When non-kin caregivers provide home care: additional burden or personal benefit for friends, neighbours, and acquaintances? - Findings from an exploratory cross-sectional study].

Natascha Lauer, Maria Heckel, Sophia Bösl, Johanna Schmidt, André Kratzer, Elmar Gräßel, Anna Pendergrass

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natascha LauerZentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-7497-6431
Maria HeckelPalliativmedizinische Abteilung, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Sophia BöslZentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-6268-2568
Johanna SchmidtZentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-4099-4235
André KratzerZentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7906-3079
Elmar GräßelZentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Anna PendergrassZentrum für Medizinische Versorgungsforschung, Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the proportion of non-kin caregivers providing home care for friends, neighbours, and acquaintances is steadily increasing, there is a lack of research that goes beyond the general characteristics of this subgroup. The aim of this exploratory study is to provide the first in-depth examination of the non-kin caregiver population and highlight differences between non-kin and family caregivers in terms of the burden and perceived benefits of informal care. Methods: The data are based on a representative sample (n=2927) of non-kin and family caregivers of statutorily insured care recipients, surveyed in a cross-sectional study in cooperation with MD Bayern. The general characteristics, burden, and perceived benefits of non-kin caregivers (n=71) were examined. The main focus was on comparative analyses with family caregivers (n=2856) using χ²-tests and independent samples t-tests, or corresponding non-parametric tests. Results: Non-kin and family caregivers did not differ in terms of general characteristics. Despite having the same objective burden (t(74.45)=1.80, p=0.077), non-kin caregivers perceived the caregiving situation as significantly less burdensome (t(72.56)=2.57, p=0.012), experienced significantly more benefits from informal care (t(2925)=-3.37, p<0.001), and rated their mental health significantly more positively (t(72.84)=-2.52, p=0.014). Conclusion: Non-kin caregivers are less likely to experience high levels of subjective burden and often derive greater personal benefit from the support, care, or assistance of someone from their neighborhood, social circle, or acquaintances. As such, they represent a valuable resource that could help strengthen informal care in the future.

Indexed as

CaregiversCost of IllnessFriendsHome Care ServicesHome NursingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41628636
PMCPMC13246226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.