Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628431›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Development and Feasibility Assessment of an Intrinsic Capacity Program in Primary Care: Protocol for an Implementation Science Approach.

Qing Wang, Mimaika Luluina Ginting, Ezra Ho, Siew Fong Goh, Jonathan Gao, Woan Shin Tan, Yew Yoong Ding, Wei Liang David Ng, Jonathan Choon Aik Ng, Sing Cheer Kwek and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06753643 (Implementing the National Frailty Policy in Singapore's Primary Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06753643 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Implementing the National Frailty Policy in Singapore's Primary Care: A Pilot Feasibility Study of The Intrinsic Capacity ProMotion in PrimAry Care for The Frail Program (IMPACTFrail)

TypeobservationalSponsorGeriatric Education and Research InstituteRan2025 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsHealthy Ageing, FrailtyArmsThe IMPACTFrail programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Qing WangGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6174-3993
Mimaika Luluina GintingGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0319-8097
Ezra HoGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-2713
Siew Fong GohGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1088-775X
Jonathan GaoGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-3072
Woan Shin TanGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-0412
Yew Yoong DingGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3128-8954
Wei Liang David NgNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7228-4343
Jonathan Choon Aik NgNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0723-4408
Sing Cheer KwekNational University Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6219-6529
Richard Jor Yeong HuiNational University Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1074-7196
Zhen Sinead WangSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5883-4361
Chirk Jenn NgSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-1603
Grace SumGeriatric Education & Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-2700
IMPACTFrail GroupSee Acknowledgments, .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) public health framework for healthy aging advocates for action on the trajectories of intrinsic capacity (IC) across a person's life course to optimize functional ability. While the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) framework provides guidance on a systematic care pathway on IC screening, clinical assessment to clarify IC deficits and person-centered management, its real-world implementation and evaluation remain nascent. The Intrinsic Capacity Promotion in Primary Care for the Frail (IMPACTFrail) program for mildly frail older adults in Singapore's primary care seeks to operationalize WHO ICOPE and national strategies.

objectiveThe objectives of this study are (1) the co-development of IMPACTFrail's core functions and its delivery, as well as selecting, specifying and operationalizing implementation strategies to address anticipated barriers and leverage anticipated facilitators and (2) to conduct a feasibility assessment on the readiness to scale to a main study.

methodsFor the first objective, the co-development process is guided by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council's (MRC's) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions and the Framework of Actions for Intervention Development (FAID). The identification of contextual barriers and facilitators will draw on the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and its Outcomes Addendum. To identify individual-level behavior change barriers, we will extend this framework using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy guided our selection and development of implementation strategies. The collaboration involves implementation researchers, clinic leadership, frontline health care providers, and older adults. A 12-month, single-arm feasibility study will recruit 180 older adults aged 60 years and older with mild frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale score 4-5) across 5 public primary care clinics. Feasibility criteria include implementation, acceptability, practicality, and adaptability. We will narratively triangulate findings across study components to enhance the validity and credibility of the feasibility study, including (1) process evaluation using quantitative process indicators, (2) qualitative study to elicit barriers and facilitators to feasibility, sustainability and scalability, and to assess the attribution of the selected implementation strategies to implementation outcomes, (3) cost analysis, and (4) program description.

resultsThe study was funded in September 2024. Data collection for the feasibility assessment commenced in April 2025 and will conclude by March 2026. As of manuscript submission, 98 participants have been recruited across 5 sites. Recruitment, data collection, and analysis are ongoing. Publication of results is expected in early 2027.

conclusionsThis protocol contributes to the literature by providing a detailed protocol on the co-development and feasibility testing of a complex intervention to enhance transparency, fidelity, and replicability. It disseminates knowledge on the integration of frameworks and methodologies to accelerate the translation of evidence to sustainable and scalable programs in practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06753643; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06753643. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/84257.

Indexed as

Implementation SciencePrimary Health CareAgedFeasibility StudiesFrail ElderlyHumansProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSingaporeagedco-developmentfeasibilityfrailtyICOPEimplementation scienceintegrated care for older peopleintrinsic capacityprimary careWHOworld health organization

Identifiers

PMID41628431
PMCPMC12910274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.