Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628348›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Sourcing the origins of carnelian in early Chinese civilizations.

Meiting Yan, Jiancheng Liu, Chunlei Qin, Xuemei He, Xiaoguang Li, Jian Yu, Ruilin Mao, Hongye Han, Zhanwei Sun, Chong Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Meiting Yan *State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4722-7536
Jiancheng Liu *Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu 610041, China.
Chunlei QinBeijing Bead Museum, Beijing 100024, China.ORCID 0009-0001-1721-107X
Xuemei HeSchool of Gemmology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaoguang LiState Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-2458
Jian YuSanxingdui Museum, Guanghan 618300, China.
Ruilin MaoGansu Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Lanzhou 730015, China.
Hongye HanBeijing Institute of Archaeology, Beijing 100009, China.
Zhanwei SunShaanxi Academy of Archaeology, Xi'an 710075, China.
Chong WangSichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhenbin XieSichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu 610041, China.
Honglin RanSichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu 610041, China.
Fei TangSichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jonathan Mark KenoyerUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Zihua TangState Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-7145

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42372216the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program 2024YFFK0125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carnelian beads in high-status burials of the Western Zhou period (ca. 1000-800 BCE) have long been seen as key evidence for long-distance exchange between East Asia and regions to the west, while their geological origins and circulation pathways have remained poorly constrained. Using a newly established geochemical database of 300 geological samples from 27 potential sources across Asia, we conducted trace-element analyses of 11 carnelian beads from the Sanxingdui pits (ca. 1200-1000 BCE), Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Canonical discriminant analysis indicates that the raw materials of these carnelian beads do not primarily derive from south China, but the Yanshan Orogeny, Central Asian Orogenic Belt and some unknown sources that might be close to Hexi Corridor, pointing to raw-material sources located over 1,000 km to the north of the Sichuan Basin. Comparative analyses of contemporaneous beads from Gansu, Shaanxi, and Beijing show similar northern provenance signatures, suggesting a broad and persistent exchange sphere spanning the southern Mongolian Plateau, Loess Plateau, eastern Tibetan Plateau, Central Plains, and Sichuan Basin between 1500-1000 BCE. Our results provide the earliest direct geochemical evidence for long-distance carnelian exchange in Bronze Age China and demonstrate the value of integrating geochemical sourcing with archaeological context to reconstruct ancient interaction networks.

Indexed as

carnelian beadsChinese Bronze AgeSanxingduisourcingtrace elements

Identifiers

PMID41628348
PMCPMC12913004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.