ArticlePloS one2026
Spatial overlap of sea ice-associated predators and prey in western Hudson Bay.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatio-temporal distribution of species shapes community structure and ecosystem function, yet the mechanisms driving biological hotspots remain unclear in dynamic environments like sea ice. We computed Getis-Ord (Gi*) distribution hotspots based on four years of direct and indirect observations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus), Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus), ringed seals (Pusa hispida), and bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) in western Hudson Bay, to identify spatial clustering and assess spatial relationships among these ice-associated species. We further mapped distribution hotspots of bear-hunting sign to examine predator-prey and intraguild relationships. Polar bears and bearded seals primarily used offshore areas, while Arctic foxes concentrated their activity on nearshore ice. Ringed seals built lairs throughout the study area but they mostly hauled out on landfast ice. The polar bear hotspot overlapped largely (30% - 49%) with those of the three other species. Particularly, 80% of the Arctic fox hotspot was included in the polar bear hotspot. In contrast, bearded seals and ringed seals had low overlap (18%), reflecting their different habitat preferences. Understanding current patterns in ice-associated species' distributions and relationships is crucial to inform conservation actions and for predicting direct and indirect effects of Arctic warming. Our results help identify key ecological areas on sea ice and demonstrate how systematic collection of opportunistic observations can be combined to generate valuable ecological insights at low cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.