ArticlePloS one2026
Boosting brain tumor segmentation: A novel 3D pooling approach with U-net 3D.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading on MRI Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark-Driven Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor segmentation is a crucial task in medical imaging that has a significant impact on diagnosis and treatment planning. This study introduces a novel 3D pooling layer within the U-Net 3D architecture to enhance segmentation accuracy from multimodal MRI. The method addresses the limitations of conventional pooling techniques by considering the interdependencies between MRI pixels, thereby improving the model's ability to capture complex tumor structures. To increase robustness to intensity variation, two complementary normalization pipelines were trained independently with identical networks, and predictions from selected epochs were fused by simple probability averaging to form the final ensemble. Evaluation was conducted on BraTS2020 using five-fold cross-validation. On the validation set, the ensemble achieved Dice (ET/TC/WT)=0.8299/0.8882/0.8986 and HD95=4.40/4.95/11.14, reflecting consistent gains over max-pooling variants and comparing favorably with recent methods while using a lightweight fusion mechanism. These results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed 3D pooling approach and pave the way for more robust algorithms in automated brain tumor segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.