ArticlePloS one2026
Distribution of visuo-attentional resources while reading multiple words.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have investigated the role of semantic processing in the parafovea using the Rapid Parallel Visual Presentation (RPVP) paradigm, which involves the simultaneous presentation of two words, one in the fovea (W1) and one in the parafovea (W2). Results have shown that both accuracy and response times are influenced by the semantic relatedness between the words. These findings suggest that semantic information can be extracted from the parafovea and in parallel with the processing of the foveal word. In the present study, we aimed to provide further evidence of parallel semantic processing and to gain deeper insight into the availability and spatial distribution of attentional resources when semantic relatedness is present. Two experiments were conducted. In both, the first part replicated the previous RPVP setup: two words were simultaneously presented and participants were required to read them aloud. Frequency and semantic relatedness between the two words were manipulated. Results replicated previous findings. Crucially, each experiment included a second task: as participants began reading the two words, a probe (an asterisk) could appear to the right of the parafoveal word (Experiment 1) or above the foveal word (Experiment 2). Probe detection times and accuracy were equally facilitated at both positions when the two words was of high-frequency and semantically related. In contrast, when W1 was of low-frequency, neither accuracy nor reaction times in probe detection benefited from parafoveal processing, suggesting that an increased load on the foveal word hinders parafoveal processing. Finally, the same probe detection results were obtained - both in terms of mean reaction times and accuracy - across the two spatial positions, indicating an even distribution of attentional resources across foveal and parafoveal words.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.