Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628232›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Model-free prognostication of non-linear time series.

Xiaoyong Wu, Shesh N Rai, Georg F Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoyong WuBiostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Shesh N RaiBiostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Georg F WeberUniversity of Cincinnati Cancer Center, College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3996-677X

Funding

Metabolic Mechanisms in Cancer ProgressionR15CA224104 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WEBER, GEORG F · 2018 to 2018
$480k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA224104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of studying the course of infectious progression. Similar needs exist for time series of other origins. While models are commonly devised and fitted to the observed data, we recently demonstrated the feasibility to directly evaluate the noisy non-linear time series that characterize the occurrence. However, for practical utility, analytics alone has limited value. The requirement of forecasting - at least in the short term - needs to be met.

methodsWe initially utilized normalized new infections per day (7-day moving average for cases per million inhabitants) from Our World in Data. We then validated our method in unrelated non-linear time series of stock markets and blowfly populations. We studied a novel model-independent time series approach, time lagged analyses, and feature-space plots incorporating the time-lagged data.

results1) Machine learning on the basis of correlation coefficient, utilizing about 80% of the time series as training sets, was able to generate excellent predictions for progression. 2) Feature-space plots of normalized new cases versus autocorrelation and average mutual information required a form of dynamic calibration to correct for differences in scale among the axes. With that adjustment, the maximum local Lyapunov exponent displayed sharp spikes concomitantly with peaks of infectious spread. 3) The average mutual information over various time lags and wave lengths displayed divergence and sums of absolute values that were anticipatory to peaks in new infections.

conclusionThe study of non-linear time series with available techniques for observed complex data can extract characteristics that enable short-range forecasting without the need for model-building. Time-lagged analysis provides one suitable foundation. Among various approaches, machine learning achieved the best prognosticative results.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnimalsHumansMachine LearningNonlinear DynamicsPandemicsPrediction AlgorithmsPrognosisSARS-CoV-2Time Factors

Identifiers

PMID41628232
PMCPMC12863698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.