Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628180›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Assessing research productivity in addiction datasets using OpenAlex.

David Melero-Fuentes, Cristina Rius, Rut Lucas-Domínguez, Juan Carlos Valderrama-Zurián

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Melero-FuentesAdolescence, Addictions and Development Research Group, Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina RiusUISYS Group, Department of History of Science and Information Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0572-5620
Rut Lucas-DomínguezUISYS Group, Department of History of Science and Information Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Juan Carlos Valderrama-ZuriánUISYS Group, Department of History of Science and Information Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Open Science model has fostered new communication and archiving processes, supported by information technology. Within this framework, the open deposit of health-related datasets and their use in evaluating researchers and institutions are encouraged, with emerging information systems offering open alternatives to traditional databases. This study aims to analyse OpenAlex as a tool for retrieving research-derived datasets in a pilot study in the field of addictive substances, to determine whether it serves to automatically evaluate researchers and institutions inherent in the retrieved datasets. Results show that four repositories accounted for 85.8% of the 2782 datasets related to the addictive substances, being 30% of the records properly datasets followed by Comments on scientific investigation (21.4%), Monographs (15.1%) and Periodical publications (7.6%). In addition, missing information such as author identification (30.2%) or affiliation (69%) in the source repositories and data aggregators have been detected. Consequently, the assessment of researchers and institutions through datasets retrieved by OpenAlex would be improved by subsequently curating the information records. In conclusion, OpenAlex is a powerful tool in the Open Science medical ecosystem, and its accuracy could be enhanced by verifying the datasets collected via research information management infrastructures as well as by training professionals.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualResearchSubstance-Related DisordersHumansPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID41628180
PMCPMC12863530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.