ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Exploring understandings and approaches to decolonisation in the field of violence against women and girls: Towards conceptual clarity and actionable strategies for funding, programming and research.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recognition that decolonisation is important, there remains a lack of conceptual clarity on what exactly decolonising might involve. Our qualitative study explores how colonialism and decolonisation are conceptualised within the field of violence against women and girls (VAWG), and identifies practical strategies to decolonise funding, programming and research. Our findings draw from 17 semi-structured interviews, eight focus group discussions (FGDs) and five feedback workshops (n = 83) with practitioners, researchers and donors supporting VAWG prevention and response. We identified participants through existing professional networks and used snowball sampling to recruit participants from all world regions. Interviews and FGDs were conducted in English, French, Portuguese and Spanish. We used a reflexive thematic approach for analysis. There was confusion and disagreement about what the term 'decolonisation' means. To address this, VAWG actors must identify the legacy and impact of colonialism for the field, and clarify the roles of Northern and Southern actors in decolonising. Our findings highlight that the area where most work is still needed is around VAWG programming, where coloniality may be embedded into programme design and implementation, requiring more concerted actions to decolonise. Funding was also identified as a key area where structural reform is needed. Research, however, was an area where there appeared to be much higher awareness and action related to decolonising, linked to momentum around dismantling research-based power hierarchies outside of the VAWG field. This research contributes to articulating the main barriers to decolonising and identifies practical actions for funding, programming and research within the VAWG field and beyond.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.