Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Research on the threshold of the supply and demand of ecosystem services.

Huangwei Deng, Zhenliang Liao, Xuefei Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huangwei DengCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenliang LiaoCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-737X
Xuefei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological threshold has not yet formed a unified definition, and there is no definition for "the threshold of the supply and demand of ecosystem services (TrSD)", leading to no limitation of the negative impact of production and life behavior on the supply and demand of ecosystem services. This study defined and set TrSD, and took Urumqi as an example to carry out a case study. Firstly, the concept of TrSD was elaborated referred to multiple definitions of the ecological threshold based on "the difference between the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESr)". Then, the geographical simulation and optimization system- future land use simulation (GeoSOS-FLUS) software was used to simulate future land use. After that, the Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) matrix model was applied to calculate ESr. Finally, the TrSD was determined via the inflection point analysis of ESr. This study concludes that the proposed TrSD and its systematic calculation method are innovative and rational. The results can be used for ecosystem service management and ecological valuation, which helps the sustainability progress of the global.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID41628138
PMCPMC12863479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.