ArticlePloS one2026
Making community-based health planning and services work: Staffing, accountability and digital integration for quality primary health care in Northern Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStrengthening primary health care through Ghana's Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) strategy depends on functional community structures, responsiveness, and integration into health information systems. However, the extent to which CHPS zones use the Ghana Community Scorecard (CSC) to promote accountability, equity, and service improvement remains unclear. We assessed CHPS staff categories and functionality in Northern region of Ghana and their ability to support Community Health Management Committees (CHMCs) in health facility assessments, Community Health Action Plans, and updating of results into existing digital platforms.
methodA cross-sectional design combined quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews across 86 CHPS zones in six districts between March 13-20, 2024. Analysis focused on staff categories, functionality, CSC trainings, facility assessment, utilization of results, feedback mechanisms, and service improvements. Qualitative data explored barriers and enablers shaping CHPS performance.
resultsThe 86 CHPS zones employed 549 health workers, predominantly female (51%). Categories included Community Health Officers (5%), midwives (17%), registered nurses (14%), enrolled nurses (33%), community health nurses (27%) and others (5%). Overall, 96% of CHPS zones were functional based on staff, CHMCs, volunteers, equipment, and service provision. About 88% had basic equipment. Services include outreach, home visits, minor illness treatment, antenatal care, and referrals. CSC training reached 41% of Community Health Officers and other health workers. Only 36% of the CHPS zones uploaded facility assessment results to existing digital platforms, and 46.5% implemented improvements from CSC recommendations. High-performing districts benefitted from adequate staffing, training, Non-Governmental Organization support, and community mobilization. Barriers included limited training coverage, exclusion of midwives and nurses from training, and persistent Gender, Equity and Social Inclusion (GESI) gaps.
conclusionCHPS zones show functionality but face challenges in staff capacity, training, and digital integration. Gaps in inclusivity and equipment provision limit effectiveness. Scaling-up training, strengthening human resources, improving basic equipment provision, and embedding GESI are essential to ensure CHPS zones deliver equitable, accountable, and quality services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.