ArticleComplementary medicine research2026
Erratum.
Article in Complementary medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum forSt John's Wort (2025
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the article by Kalbermatten and Saller entitled "St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) Fresh Plant Tincture for Patients with Mild to Moderate Depression: A Prospective Observational Study" [Complement Med Res. 2025;32:363-375; https://doi.org/10.1159/000547920], there is an error in Table 1. In the row for "C-SJW-ft (pp strict)", several values were incorrectly reported due to an extraneous "1" being added before the correct numbers and abbreviations. The correct values should be: "C-SJW-ft (pp strict)" (not "1C-SJW-ft"), 42 (not 142), 76% (not 176%), 24% (not 124%), 51 (not 151), 11.8 drops (not 111.8 drops), 49% (not 149%), and 50% (not 150%).The original article has been updated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.