Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41628072›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026

Neoadjuvant Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Conversion to Cytoreductive Surgery in Unresectable Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Report of 2 Cases.

Arnaldo Urbano-Ruiz, Bruna Latronico Palma, Ronaldo Elias Carnut Rego, Daniel Bianqui Guaraldo da Silva, Bianca Fava, Erlan Araujo Falcão, Michelle Louise Rodrigues Barbosa da Silva, Julia Rodrigues Leandro Uliano

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arnaldo Urbano-RuizCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Latronico PalmaCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ronaldo Elias Carnut RegoCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Daniel Bianqui Guaraldo da SilvaCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-1883-0463
Bianca FavaCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Erlan Araujo FalcãoCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Michelle Louise Rodrigues Barbosa da SilvaCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3311-3218
Julia Rodrigues Leandro UlianoCenter for Peritoneal Diseases, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is the second most common presentation site of malignant mesothelioma. The standard of care for PM is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Because of its insidious manifestations, PM is often diagnosed at advanced, unresectable stages, precluding optimal cytoreduction and diminishing long-term survivability. CASE REPORT We report 2 cases of advanced and unresectable PM (stages III and IV) presenting with symptomatic with low-grade epithelioid disease. Both cases had a high peritoneal cancer index (PCI >30) and extensive small-bowel involvement. The patients underwent pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin as downstaging conversion therapy. Patient 1 was a 47-year-old man with a laparoscopic PCI of 34 and progression of disease despite 5 months of systemic intravenous chemotherapy. After 2 cycles of PIPAC, the patient showed disease regression and complete resolution of large ascites; CRS-HIPEC was feasible with complete cytoreduction (CC-0). The patient was discharged after a 60-day hospital stay. Patient 2 was a 43-year-old man with a laparoscopic PCI of 30 and no prior lines of therapy. After a single PIPAC cycle, there was clear disease regression (PCI=23), allowing CRS-HIPEC with optimal cytoreduction (CC-1). The patient was discharged after 10 days. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC is established as a suitable option for palliation of massive ascites in PM; however, in selected candidates with favorable prognostic biomarkers and appropriate fitness for surgery, the procedure can serve as a bridge to definitive open surgery (CRS-HIPEC) aimed at achieving complete cytoreduction.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaNeoadjuvant TherapyPeritoneal NeoplasmsPressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol ChemotherapyAdultCisplatinDoxorubicinHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyMaleMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedCisplatinDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID41628072
PMCPMC12879508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.