ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Using semantic search to find publicly available gene-expression datasets.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMillions of high-throughput, molecular datasets have been shared in public repositories. Researchers can reuse such data to validate their own findings and explore novel questions. A frequent goal is to find multiple datasets that address similar research topics and to either combine them directly or integrate inferences from them. However, a major challenge is finding relevant datasets due to the vast number of candidates, inconsistencies in their descriptions, and a lack of semantic annotations. This challenge is first among the FAIR principles for scientific data. Here we focus on dataset discovery within Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), a repository containing 100 000 s of data series. GEO supports queries based on keywords, ontology terms, and other annotations. However, reviewing these results is time-consuming and tedious, and it often misses relevant datasets.
resultsWe hypothesized that language models could address this problem by summarizing dataset descriptions as numeric representations (embeddings). Assuming a researcher has previously found some relevant datasets, we evaluated the potential to find additional relevant datasets. For six human medical conditions, we used 30 models to generate embeddings for datasets that human curators had previously associated with the conditions and identified other datasets with the most similar descriptions. This approach was often, but not always, more effective than GEO's search engine. The top-performing models were trained on general corpora, used contrastive-learning strategies, and used relatively large embeddings. Our findings suggest that language models have the potential to improve dataset discovery, likely in combination with existing search tools. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our analysis code and a Web-based tool that enables others to use our methodology are available from https://github.com/srp33/GEO_NLP and https://github.com/srp33/GEOfinder3.0, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.