Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627879›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Using semantic search to find publicly available gene-expression datasets.

Grace S Brown, James Wengler, Aaron Joyce S Fabelico, Abigail Muir, Anna Tubbs, Amanda Warren, Alexandra N Millett, Xinrui Xiang Yu, Paul Pavlidis, Sanja Rogic and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Grace S BrownDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.
James WenglerDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.
Aaron Joyce S FabelicoDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.
Abigail MuirDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.
Anna TubbsDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.
Amanda WarrenDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.
Alexandra N MillettDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 0A6, Canada.
Xinrui Xiang YuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 0A6, Canada.
Paul PavlidisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-5028
Sanja RogicDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 0A6, Canada.
Stephen R PiccoloDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2001-5640

Funding

USA National Institutes of Health R01MH111099USA National Institutes of Health R03HL168983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMillions of high-throughput, molecular datasets have been shared in public repositories. Researchers can reuse such data to validate their own findings and explore novel questions. A frequent goal is to find multiple datasets that address similar research topics and to either combine them directly or integrate inferences from them. However, a major challenge is finding relevant datasets due to the vast number of candidates, inconsistencies in their descriptions, and a lack of semantic annotations. This challenge is first among the FAIR principles for scientific data. Here we focus on dataset discovery within Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), a repository containing 100 000 s of data series. GEO supports queries based on keywords, ontology terms, and other annotations. However, reviewing these results is time-consuming and tedious, and it often misses relevant datasets.

resultsWe hypothesized that language models could address this problem by summarizing dataset descriptions as numeric representations (embeddings). Assuming a researcher has previously found some relevant datasets, we evaluated the potential to find additional relevant datasets. For six human medical conditions, we used 30 models to generate embeddings for datasets that human curators had previously associated with the conditions and identified other datasets with the most similar descriptions. This approach was often, but not always, more effective than GEO's search engine. The top-performing models were trained on general corpora, used contrastive-learning strategies, and used relatively large embeddings. Our findings suggest that language models have the potential to improve dataset discovery, likely in combination with existing search tools. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our analysis code and a Web-based tool that enables others to use our methodology are available from https://github.com/srp33/GEO_NLP and https://github.com/srp33/GEOfinder3.0, respectively.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, GeneticData MiningGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingSemanticsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41627879
PMCPMC12952291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.