ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
Protein Localization with Streptavidin-Imaging: Boost Your Signal, Reduce Noise, Overcome Antibody Accessibility Problems, and Time-Travel to the Past.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunofluorescence experiments in Euglenozoa are more challenging than in cultured mammalian cells because they are smaller, often possess a protein-dense cellular envelope and antibodies are not commercially available. Here, we present streptavidin imaging as an alternative to immunofluorescence, that circumvents the above-mentioned problems, has several additional advantages and is applicable to all cells that can be genetically manipulated.For streptavidin imaging, the protein of interest is expressed fused to the biotin ligase TurboID and the (auto)biotinylation is detected with fluorescent streptavidin. In most cases, the streptavidin signal gives the same protein localization as an antibody but is superior to a classical immunofluorescence for three reasons. First, there is a significant enhancement of the signal due to multiple biotinylation sites, which is particularly useful when antigen levels are low, either due to low-level protein expression or as a result of procedures that reduce the antigen density as in expansion microscopy or correlative light and electron microscopy. Second, there is usually less unspecific signal in comparison to antibody labeling, as the streptavidin-biotin interaction is strong and highly specific. Third, streptavidin can access regions of the cell that are impermeable to most antibodies, in particular phase-separated areas like the nucleolus or the inner nuclear pore channel. In some cases, the streptavidin signal differs from the signal obtained by an antibody or a GFP fusion. The reasons are dynamic protein interactions with localization changes of either the bait protein or (some) interacting proteins. These differences between streptavidin and antibody signal can be exploited to understand protein dynamics and interactions in temporal and spatial resolution.Here, we present the protocol for streptavidin imaging: an all-in-one solution to antibody accessibility and low signal problems with the additional potential to study the dynamics of protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.