Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627710›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2026

A comparative analysis of the utilization of upper and lower extremity functions in mental chronometry tests in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Gizem Şekercan, Mehmet Fatih Yetkin, Rana Karabudak, Aslı Tuncer, Yeliz Salcı

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gizem ŞekercanFaculty of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, Kocaeli, Turkey. gizemsekercan@gmail.com.
Mehmet Fatih YetkinFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Rana KarabudakFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Aslı TuncerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Yeliz SalcıFaculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental chronometry tests, including upper and lower extremity functions, evaluate the temporal congruence component of motor imagery. This study aimed to compare the utilization of upper and lower extremity functions in mental chronometry tests.

methodsThis study included 70 individuals with multiple sclerosis and was designed based on an a priori power analysis. Mental chronometry tests, including the Box and Block Test (BBT) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), were administered, and execution times, motor imagery times, and mental chronometry ratios were compared between the most and least affected extremities.

resultsA significant difference was observed in execution times between the most and least affected extremities in BBT (p = 0.001). Similarly, motor imagery times in BBT were significantly different between most and least affected extremities (p = 0.009). However, no significant difference was found in mental chronometry ratio between the most and least affected extremities (p = 0.179). Comparisons between upper and lower extremity tests revealed that the mental chronometry ratio was significantly higher for BBT than for TUG test in both the most affected and least affected extremities (p = 0.001).

conclusionIndividuals with MS showed differences in imagery-execution congruence between upper- and lower-extremity mental chronometry tasks, with higher congruence observed in the upper-extremity task. These findings support a task-specific interpretation of motor imagery performance rather than a generalized advantage of upper-extremity motor imagery.

trial registrationNot applicable. This study was observational and did not involve a clinical trial registration.

Indexed as

ImaginationLower ExtremityMultiple SclerosisUpper ExtremityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedLower extremityMental chronometryMotor imageryMultiple sclerosisUpper extremity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.