Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627687›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Multiparametric CMR for detection of cardiac amyloidosis in patients with undifferentiated concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.

Sandra Quinn, Andrew Zbihley, Umar Ramzan, Connor Raikar, Joshua Engel, James C Carr, Bradley D Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra QuinnDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. sandra.quinn.eire@gmail.com.
Andrew ZbihleyDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Umar RamzanDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Connor RaikarDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joshua EngelDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
James C CarrDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bradley D AllenDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric CMR can detect cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in patients with undifferentiated concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A retrospective patient search was performed for patients ≥ 18 years of age who received 1.5T CMR from January 2018 to August 2022 to evaluate for myocardial infiltration in the setting of known concentric LVH at a tertiary medical center. Clinical records were reviewed for positive diagnosis or exclusion of CA. CMR were post-processed to evaluate ventricular volumes and function, native T1 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was qualitatively evaluated and each segment categorized into vascular or non-vascular LGE using the American Heart Association 16 segment model. Feature tracking strain (FTS) was performed on a subset of CA positive and CA negative patients. Group comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA (parametric) or Kruskal-Wallis (non-parametric) tests. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis with area under curve (AUC) values were generated for both individual and combined parameters using binary logistic regression (IBM SPSS Statistics V26.0, and DATATab 2025) to determine optimal cut-off parameters for detection of CA. CMR were performed in 278 patients for myocardial infiltration evaluation in the setting of known concentric LVH (mean age 63.2 ± 14.9, 46% female). Diagnostic groups were determined as follows: CA positive (n = 60), CA negative (n = 100) and CA unknown (n = 118). CA positive patients, when compared to both CA negative and CA unknown groups, respectively, demonstrated significantly higher age (69.9 ± 10.3 vs. 59.7 ± 14.2 and 62.9 ± 16.4 years), native T1 (1122.4 ± 64.6 vs. 1056.8 ± 69.7 and 1051.4 ± 54.0 ms), ECV (46.4 ± 11.5 vs. 32.1 ± 7.2 and 32.1 ± 7.6%) and number of segments with infarct-atypical LGE (10.2 ± 7.3 vs. 2.7 ± 4.7 and 2.0 ± 4.3). ROC AUC values were calculated for native T1 (0.80), ECV (0.88), and number of infarct-atypical LGE segments (0.76). A 4 parameter model including age, native T1, ECV, number of segments with non-vascular LGE demonstrated an AUC of 0.91 for detection of CA, with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 81%, which when applied to the CA unknown group, indicated 13 patients (11%) in this group may have CA. CA positive patients demonstrated reduced basal peak systolic strain and diastolic strain rates when compared to CA negative patients; a model combining these parameters with patient age demonstrated an AUC of 0.79 for detection of CA. Multiparametric CMR can discriminate CA positive patients from CA negative and undifferentiated LVH patients in a real-world tertiary center population. These findings demonstrate that CMR has significant diagnostic potential for detection of CA in patients with undifferentiated LVH.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisCardiomyopathiesHypertrophy, Left VentricularMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardiumVentricular Function, LeftAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID41627687
PMCPMC13053479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.