Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627678›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

An integrative deep learning model based on dual-mode ultrasound for diagnosing gallbladder polyps.

Congyu Tang, Yilei Shi, Lifan Wang, Xing Zhao, Chunlei Li, Peishan Guan, Zhidan Geng, Jianfei Chen, Qing Yu, Wenping Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Congyu Tang *Department of Ultrasound, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yilei Shi *MedAI Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China.
Lifan Wang *Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xing ZhaoMedAI Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China.
Chunlei LiMedAI Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China.
Peishan GuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital(Xiamen), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhidan GengDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianfei ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qing YuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenping WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. puguang61@126.com.
Xiao Xiang ZhuChair of Data Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. xiaoxiang.zhu@tum.de.
Haixia YuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. haixiayuan75@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-2502

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2023J011696Science and Technology Commission of Putuo District ptkwws202503Shanghai Putuo District Central Hospital Discipline Construction 2024xkjs02Shanghai Putuo District Central Hospital Research Talent Program 2024-YJRC-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence model to automatically differentiate between non-neoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps, while also distinguishing benign from malignant polyps. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with gallbladder polyps who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2022 to June 2023 were recruited from two hospitals retrospectively. Conventional ultrasound findings and clinical characteristics of patients before cholecystectomy were acquired. Ultrasound image blocks of gallbladder lesions were automatically segmented by the Unet network for diagnosis. A fusion deep learning model based on dual-mode ultrasound (grey-scale ultrasound and colour Doppler flow imaging) was established to diagnose gallbladder polyps and validated in the validation and test set. Finally, we compared the diagnostic efficiency of the model with that of radiologists and guidelines.

resultsA total of 339 patients (mean ages 53.17 ± 15.89, 182 females) were enroled in this study. The Dice coefficient and intersection over union (IoU) value of the automatic segmentation based on the Unet-efficientnet-b4 network were 0.912 and 0.838. In differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic polyps, the integrative deep learning (IDL) model showed area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.829 and 0.802 in validation and test sets, respectively. In differentiating benign and malignant polyps, the IDL model showed AUCs of 0.844 and 0.839 in validation and test sets, respectively. In the test set, the diagnostic performance of two junior radiologists was improved with the assistance of the IDL model.

conclusionThe IDL model based on dual-mode ultrasound could achieve accurate and automatic segmentation of gallbladder lesions, and showed excellent diagnostic performance for diagnosing gallbladder polyps. CRITICAL RELEVANT STATEMENT: We developed a deep learning model based on conventional ultrasound that performs gallbladder segmentation while differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps and benign from malignant polyps. KEY POINTS: Diagnosing gallbladder polyps through a deep learning model based on conventional ultrasound presents challenges. IDL model enables automated segmentation of the gallbladder and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps. The IDL model is a reliable tool to assist junior radiologists in diagnosis and has potential for reducing unnecessary cholecystectomies.

Indexed as

Deep learningGallbladderGallbladder polypUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41627678
PMCPMC12864583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.