ArticleInsights into imaging2026
An integrative deep learning model based on dual-mode ultrasound for diagnosing gallbladder polyps.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence model to automatically differentiate between non-neoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps, while also distinguishing benign from malignant polyps. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with gallbladder polyps who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2022 to June 2023 were recruited from two hospitals retrospectively. Conventional ultrasound findings and clinical characteristics of patients before cholecystectomy were acquired. Ultrasound image blocks of gallbladder lesions were automatically segmented by the Unet network for diagnosis. A fusion deep learning model based on dual-mode ultrasound (grey-scale ultrasound and colour Doppler flow imaging) was established to diagnose gallbladder polyps and validated in the validation and test set. Finally, we compared the diagnostic efficiency of the model with that of radiologists and guidelines.
resultsA total of 339 patients (mean ages 53.17 ± 15.89, 182 females) were enroled in this study. The Dice coefficient and intersection over union (IoU) value of the automatic segmentation based on the Unet-efficientnet-b4 network were 0.912 and 0.838. In differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic polyps, the integrative deep learning (IDL) model showed area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.829 and 0.802 in validation and test sets, respectively. In differentiating benign and malignant polyps, the IDL model showed AUCs of 0.844 and 0.839 in validation and test sets, respectively. In the test set, the diagnostic performance of two junior radiologists was improved with the assistance of the IDL model.
conclusionThe IDL model based on dual-mode ultrasound could achieve accurate and automatic segmentation of gallbladder lesions, and showed excellent diagnostic performance for diagnosing gallbladder polyps. CRITICAL RELEVANT STATEMENT: We developed a deep learning model based on conventional ultrasound that performs gallbladder segmentation while differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps and benign from malignant polyps. KEY POINTS: Diagnosing gallbladder polyps through a deep learning model based on conventional ultrasound presents challenges. IDL model enables automated segmentation of the gallbladder and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps. The IDL model is a reliable tool to assist junior radiologists in diagnosis and has potential for reducing unnecessary cholecystectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.