SynthesisMycotoxin research2026
Prevalence of mycotoxin contamination in different types of tea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Mycotoxin research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The consumption of tea as a beverage is considerably increasing worldwide. However, some questions are raised about its safety, particularly regarding the potential contamination by mycotoxins. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to assess the overall prevalence of mycotoxin contamination in different types of tea (black, green, dark, white and pu-erh), to compare the contamination rate between two periods (2000-2017 and 2018-2022), and to investigate the impact of country's income on this contamination. Included studies were selected from Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar research databases, according to PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using MecdCalc software. Concerning the analytical methods used for mycotoxin detection, 84.6% of included studies used HPLC and or LC-MS/MS. In the 21 included studies, the mycotoxin contamination was predominantly by deoxynivalenol, with 43.8% (95% CI: 8.2%- 83.8%), followed by ochratoxin A (29.1% (95% CI: 11.9%- 50.2%)), enniatin (23.7% (95% CI: 1.7%- 60.1%)), citrinin (23.6% (95% CI: 6.2%- 47.8%)), zearalenone (17.8% (95% CI: 5.1%- 36.0%)), and aflatoxins (12.4% (95% CI: 7.8%- 17.9%)). Regarding tea categories, black tea was the most contaminated type, with a rate of 89.2% (95% CI: 73.9%-98.3%), followed by green tea with a rate of 67.3% (95% CI: 37.0%-91.2%). The contamination prevalence was higher in studies conducted before 2018 than those of the 2018-2022 period, and lower in high-income countries compared to middle and low-income countries, where tea contamination was rarely reported. Therefore, more stringent prevention strategies, including regulatory measures, are needed to decrease the risk of tea consumers exposure to mycotoxins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.