ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Integrating AI Scribes into Medical Education: Guardrails for Preserving Clinical Reasoning.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Agents and the Future of Clinical Judgment in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Need for Human-Centered Integration.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Re-Centering Clinical Documentation in the Age of AI Scribes: Four Aims of the Patient Chart Note.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Impact of an Ambient AI Scribe on Medical Student Objective Structured Clinical Examination Notes: Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical documentation is a cornerstone of physician training, not only as a record of care but as a catalyst for clinical reasoning. For medical trainees, writing notes compels them to prioritize information, justify decisions, and synthesize fragmented data into coherent narratives. With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) scribes that auto-generate clinical notes from ambient audio, the task of composing notes is increasingly outsourced, raising questions about its impact on education. At our internal medicine residency program, we piloted a 6-month implementation of an AI scribe tool with 48 residents, generating nearly 1000 notes. We propose seven best practices-mapped to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies-with the goal that AI scribes support, rather than erode, the development of reflective practice and diagnostic thinking. These include establishing baseline documentation skills, structured AI training, critical review of AI-generated notes, and new opportunities for feedback. In this formative moment, educators must guide learners to use AI as a scaffold for reasoning, not a substitute for it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.