ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
Patterns and Transitions of Bullying Participant Roles: the Predictive Roles of Self- and Peer-perceived Peer Status.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bullying operates as a group process involving different participant roles, whose interactions shape how bullying unfolds. However, research delineating the profiles and transitions of these roles, as well as the influence of self- and peer-perceived peer status on such dynamics, remains limited. Using latent profile analysis and latent transition analysis, this study examined the profiles and transitions of five distinct bullying participant roles (i.e., perpetrators, victims, followers, defenders, and outsiders) among Chinese adolescents, along with the predictive roles of self-perceived and peer-perceived peer status (i.e., likeability and popularity), respectively. A total of 3769 adolescents (50.6% boy at T1; Mage = 12.78; SD = 0.45) participated in the study across two waves over a six-month period. Four bullying roles profiles were identified at both time points: (1) non-involved, (2) victim, (3) perpetrator-follower, and (4) defender-outsider. The majority of adolescents either maintained their membership in their initial group or transitioned into the non-involved group over the study period. Furthermore, adolescents with higher peer-perceived status were more likely to belong to, or transition toward, more adaptive patterns of involvement, such as non-involved or defender-outsider, whereas self-perceived likeability and popularity demonstrated more nuanced and mixed associations across profiles. These findings deepen understanding of the diverse patterns that characterize adolescents’ involvement across bullying participant roles and indicate that peer-perceived status is the most powerful and protective predictor of maintaining more adaptive patterns of bullying involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.