Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627650›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026

Evaluating dose distribution in prostate IMRT patients using deep learning: the influence of loss function on model performance.

Arezoo Kazemzadeh, Reza Rasti, Alireza Amouheidari, Iraj Abedi, Mohammad Bagher Tavakoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arezoo KazemzadehDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Reza RastiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza AmouheidariHead of Radiation Oncology Department, Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Iraj AbediDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Bagher TavakoliDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. mbtavakoli@mui.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To estimate the influence of various loss functions on the performance of deep learning (DL) models for dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. A retrospective dataset comprising 110 prostate cancer patients was utilized. DL model was trained using various loss functions: mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and combinations of MAE with predefined domain-specific knowledge, including dose-volume histogram (DVH) loss and moment loss function. The planned target volume (PTV) and dosimetric metrics for organs at risk (OARs) were used to assess the model's performance. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to perform statistical comparisons between the clinical and predicted plans. In terms of dose deviations for OARs and PTV, the model trained with MAE plus moment loss performed better than models trained with MAE + DVH loss, MSE, or MAE. The MAE ± standard deviation (SD) between clinical and predicted dose distributions in the test cohort were (1.76 ± 0.5) Gy, (1.78 ± 0.5) Gy, (1.93 ± 0.6) Gy, and (2.02 ± 0.4) Gy for MAE + moment, MAE + DVH, MSE, and MAE models, respectively. Compared to the ground truth plans, the accuracy of all predicted plans was clinically acceptable. This study highlights how important loss function choice is to the optimization of DL-based prostate IMRT dose prediction models. The performance of the model is greatly improved by incorporating domain-specific knowledge into the loss function, which supports the possible practical application of such models for more precise and personalized radiation planning.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMaleOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesDeep learningDose predictionIntensity-modulated radiotherapyLoss functionProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.