ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid Presepsin vs. Procalcitonin in Post-Neurosurgical Bacterial Ventriculitis/Meningitis: A Machine Learning Analytical Approach.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid presepsin and procalcitonin in patients who had undergone neurosurgery between November 2023 and December 2024 enrolled on the basis of specific guidelines. Cerebrospinal fluid presepsin and procalcitonin levels were evaluated via ELISA. Machine learning models were implemented to assess the diagnostic accuracy. A total of 120 patients were included in the study and categorized into three different groups. Machine learning model: random forest model was implemented for ROC curve analysis and the model had an accuracy of 94.5%. The optimal presepsin cut-off value for discriminating between the infectious and non-infectious group was 1729 pg/ml. The specificity and sensitivity for presepsin was 0.875 and 0.632, respectively, and the AUCs for all groups were greater than 0.800 in the random forest model. The specificity and sensitivity for PCT were 0.458 and 0.789, respectively, and the AUCs for the confirmed and probable groups were 0.810 and 0.800 respectively. The variable importance plot revealed presepsin to be the second most useful parameter in model prediction. The random forest model has good performance in predicting infections among neurosurgical patients. CSF presepsin clearly distinguished the three groups, and the median PCT levels were similar across the three groups. The optimal cut-off for PCT is not suggestive compared with presepsin. CSF presepsin is a better biomarker than CSF PCT in diagnosing post-neurosurgery patients and can be implemented in routine diagnostic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.