ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2026
Electroretinography (ERG) alterations following positional changes in gas-filled eyes after a vitrectomy.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecording electroretinograms (ERGs) in eyes with intraocular gas tamponade is difficult, and the mechanism remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of intraocular gas on ERGs by comparing recordings at different body positions.
methodsThis study included 31 patients who underwent vitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) or air tamponade at Hirosaki University (between May 2023 and October 2024). The patients included those with retinal detachment (25 patients), macular holes (4 patients), and epiretinal membranes (2 patients). ERGs were recorded using skin electrodes when approximately 50% of the vitreous cavity was filled with the intraocular gas. ERGs were recorded in sitting, supine, and face-down positions. Amplitudes and latencies of the LA 3 b-wave and LA 30 Hz were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests.
resultsIn the gas-filled eyes, amplitudes in the face-down position were smaller, and latencies were longer than those in the other positions (p < 0.05). Median amplitudes in the gas-filled eyes in the sitting, supine, and face-down positions were 20.4, 19.5, and 10.1 µV for LA 3 and 14.4, 15.5, and 7.11 for LA 30 Hz, respectively; median latencies were 32.5, 33.0, and 34.3 ms for LA 3 and 30.8, 30.0, and 34.3 for LA 30 Hz, respectively.
conclusionsERG amplitudes were reduced and latencies were prolonged in the face-down position, which may be attributed to a larger retinal area being covered by intraocular gas. The gas acts as an insulator, and the gas-covered retina may not effectively generate or transmit electrical signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.