Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627579›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific publications in the field of hernia surgery: a brief bibliometric analysis.

Hakan Kulacoglu, Haydar Celasin, Tugba Akkaya Hocagil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hakan KulacogluAnkara Hernia Center, Ankara, Turkey. hakankulacoglu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7907-4587
Haydar CelasinDepartment of Surgery, Akay Hospital, Lokman Hekim University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Tugba Akkaya HocagilDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Sihhiye, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic to the publication activity in herniology.

methodsA PubMed search was used to perform a comprehensive search of the scientific literature each year between 2010 and 2024 by using key words as “inguinal hernia,”“umbilical hernia,” “incisional hernia,” “laparoscopic inguinal hernia,” “laparoscopic incisional hernia,” “robotic inguinal hernia,” and “robotic ventral hernia.” The analysis was done both annually and across three consecutive 5-year intervals: 2010–2014 [Period A], 2015–2019 [Period B], and 2020–2024 [Period C]. Period C, which corresponds to the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, was also searched for the publications about inguinal and ventral hernias which were related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsA total of more than 40,000 hernia-related publications were identified between 2010 and 2024. Publication activity demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, with notable shifts in thematic focus over time. The most frequently retrieved keywords were inguinal hernia, hernia mesh, and incisional hernia. Publications on inguinal hernia increased from 3,172 in 2010 to 4,525 in 2020, representing a 1.43-fold increase. Similarly, hernia mesh publications rose from 2,847 to 4,410 (1.55-fold), and incisional hernia publications nearly doubled from 1,187 to 2,336 (1.97-fold). Topics related to minimally invasive and robotic techniques exhibited the most pronounced fold increases. During the pandemic, publication activity in hernia research continued to grow up to 2021 but experienced a temporary slowdown between 2021 and 2022. In negative binomial regression models adjusting only for calendar year, no statistically significant association was observed between the COVID-19 period and overall publication volume (IRR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.47, 2.15]). After adjustment for calendar year and publication topic, the COVID-19 period was associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in publication volume (IRR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.01, 1.33], p = .037). In addition, a significant positive secular trend was observed across years (IRR per year = 1.05, 95% CI [1.03, 1.06]).

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic did not lead to a dramatic reduction in the overall volume of publications. There was a slight slowdown in the number of papers in certain subjects of hernia surgery, however, in the post-pandemic period publication activity rapidly returned to its pre-pandemic trajectory.

Indexed as

BibliometricsCOVID-19HerniorrhaphyPeriodicals as TopicHernia, InguinalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Bibliometric analysisCOVID-19Hernia surgeryPandemic impactScientific publications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.