ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Investigating the risk factors of sleep disturbances following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease: a case-control study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of global cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with a prevalence of 11% in Chinese adults and accounting for ~ 18 million annual deaths worldwide.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess sleep quality and the degree of sleep apnoea in CAD patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and identify key risk factors.
methodsThis multicentre, retrospective, case-control study was conducted at three tertiary centres in Changsha, China. Patients met the International Society of Cardiology and World Health Organization clinical diagnostic criteria, had CAD confirmed by angiography, had undergone PCI, and were stable. They were grouped by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Sleep status and risk factors were analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsAmong all 202 enrolled patients, univariate analysis showed significant differences between groups in gender (χ²=4.606, p = 0.032), age (63.38 ± 10.55 vs. 57.21 ± 9.37 years, t = 3.447, p < 0.001), maximum stenosis area (63.72% [56.98-66.49] vs. 57.46% [53.83-63.53], Z = - 4.919, p < 0.001), marital status (p = 0.025), smoking history (χ²=7.672, p = 0.006), alcohol history (χ²=9.640, p = 0.002), and tea drinking frequency (χ²=14.049, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis indicated younger age (OR = 0.346, 95% CI:0.165-0.725, p = 0.005) and no alcohol history (OR = 0.420, 95% CI:0.187-0.944, p = 0.036) as protective factors, while less frequent tea drinking (OR = 2.758, 95% CI:1.223-6.224, p = 0.015) was a risk factor.
conclusionSleep disturbances were present in 79.2% of post-PCI CAD patients. Age, alcohol consumption, and infrequent tea drinking were independent factors significantly associated with poor sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.