Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627534›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Healthcare team trust, care coordination, and care access among cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions: a mixed method analysis.

Michelle Doose, Dana C Verhoeven, LaTausha Rogers, Veronica Chollette, Sallie J Weaver

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle Doose *Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Dana C Verhoeven *Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984355, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, NE, 68198, USA. dverhoeven@unmc.edu.
LaTausha RogersOffice of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Veronica CholletteHealth Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Sallie J WeaverHealth Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) are a growing population with complex health needs, yet little is known about their care experiences and healthcare team trust.

methodsThis mixed methods study used a convenience sample of 441 adult cancer survivors recruited through online survey platforms. Participants completed surveys assessing care coordination, care access, healthcare team trust, and whether their care team included a social worker, navigator, or care coordinator during the 12 months after diagnosis. Twelve survivors also participated in semi-structured interviews. Relationships between care coordination and care access with healthcare team trust were examined using multivariable logistic regression followed by qualitative analysis of interviews.

resultsOverall 20.4% reported low trust in their healthcare team, 51.5% reported at least one care coordination problem, and 27.2% reported at least one care access issue. The adjusted prevalence odds ratios for low healthcare team trust were 14.5 times higher for cancer survivors who reported problems with care coordination (95% CI, 6.73, 31.29) and 6.3 times higher for care access problems (95% CI, 3.66, 10.69) compared with survivors reporting no problems. Having a social worker, coordinator, or navigator did not moderate these associations (p-values > 0.05). Participants described medical paternalism, transparency, honesty, established relationships, intergenerational trust, empathy and respect, and credibility as key experiences and attributes associated with trust.

conclusionExperiencing care problems was associated with reporting lower trust in one's healthcare team among cancer survivors with MCC, which represents potential modifiable points for intervention to improve trust, health outcomes, and quality of life.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsContinuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilityMultiple Chronic ConditionsNeoplasmsPatient Care TeamTrustAdultAgedFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer survivorsCare accessMultiple chronic conditionsPatient care teamTrust

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.